Every year many people sustain injuries because of a pedestrian accident. This could be the result of a poorly maintained sidewalk or being hit by a car while crossing a crosswalk. When a pedestrian suffers such an injury because of the negligence or irresponsibility of the other party, he or she may be entitled to compensation
If the other party is responsible for the accident, it means that they failed to take the appropriate measures to prevent its occurrence. In order to prove that the other party was negligent for the pedestrian accident, the injured person must prove that the party failed to remove potential risks that led to the emergence of the accident. To do so, the injured person needs the assistance of a reputable Pedestrian Lawyer in King George VA area. It is always advisable you consult your pedestrian accident attorney immediately after the accident ha occurred. This will help to ensure the accident is well evaluated and the victim has the best chance of being awarded the appropriate compensation.
It is important to note that if you are victim of a pedestrian accident, the negligent party might try to blame you by claiming that you were irresponsibile and caused the accident. It is highly advisable you also call the police immediately after the accident. More importantly, do not leave the scene of the accident, gather names and phone numbers of any witnesses and do not make any statements to anyone, and then call an experienced pedestrian accident lawyer, as soon as possible.
A pedestrian accident attorney will help to determine who is at fault and advise you on the next step. They will gather all the necessary evidence, arrange for witness interviews, collect reports including medical reports, file a claim with the courts, prepare and arrange the case. If a settlement is not reached before the trial begins, the lawyer will represent you in court.
To recover the damages from a pedestrian accident case, the Pedestrian Lawyer King George VA must prove to the court that a dangerous condition that was unreasonable risk to the people existed, and that the other party had either created the condition, knew the condition existed and failed to correct it or the condition existed for a such a time that the other party should have discovered it and corrected it, but failed to do so and thereby caused the accident. continue reading this.
